State v. Hahn

Lester E. Hahn appeals a judgment of conviction on six counts of intentionally collecting proceeds of a gambling machine, as a party to the crime, pursuant to § 945.03(5), Stats. Hahn argues that § 945.01(3), which defines a gambling machine, is unconstitutionally vague. He also argues there was insufficient evidence at trial to convict him and the State did not timely meet its obligations to disclose certain information under the court's discovery order. We conclude the statute is not unconstitutionally vague and there was sufficient evidence to support the guilty verdicts. We also conclude…