Legal Opinion
United States v. Nana Agyemang, Also Known as James Amabuto, Also Known as Nanda Alapati
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 26, 1989No. 88-2577PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANION, Circuit Judge.
Nana Agyemang pleaded guilty to two counts of bank fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1344. Agyemang appeals his sentence, protesting the procedure the district court used at the sentencing hearing, the court’s reliance on hearsay information, and the adequacy of the information to support certain assertions in the presentence report that he challenged. Agyemang also contends that the district court should have sentenced him under the Sentencing Guidelines (which the district court previously had found unconstitutional) rather than under pre-Guideline law. We reject Agyemang’s arguments…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. SatterfieldCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Juventino Mejia-OroscoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- United States v. Ira Silverman (90-3205) Morris G. Woodard (90-5816) and Gary Caton (90-5733/91-6506)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Michael J. McNeese and Laura ConwellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- George Del Vecchio, Cross-Appellee v. Illinois Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Scott FranzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.