Doppes v. Bentley Motors, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FYBEL, J.
Introduction
August B. Doppes purchased a Bentley automobile that produced an obnoxious odor in its interior. He prevailed at trial against Bentley Motors, Inc. (Bentley), on claims for violation of the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (Civ. Code, § 1790 et seq.), breach of express warranty, and breach of implied warranty. The judgment awarded Doppes reimbursement concurrent with his return of the car to Bentley and prejudgment interest at an annual rate of 7 percent.
Bentley did not appeal from the judgment. Instead, eight months after its entry, Bentley filed a motion to set…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lakin v. Watkins Associated IndustriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Generale Bank Nederland, N v. v. Eyes of Beholder Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Duale v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Jones v. World Life Research InstituteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Carr v. KaminsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Warren v. Kia Motors Am., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Pierce v. Heiple CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Warren v. Kia Motors America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2018