Legal Opinion · Dissent

Link v. Haire

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1928No. 6,271Published

1DissentJustice Galen

I do not agree with the majority opinion or the conclusion therein reached. In my opinion the statute (sec. 10261, Rev. Codes 1921) is exclusive, and the surviving partner may not obtain the intervention of equity to compel the executrix to account, since he is possessed of ample legal authority to continue in the possession of the partnership property and finally conclude the business of the partnership. By the statute, it is expressly provided that “when a partnership exists between the decedent, at the time of his death, and any other person, the surviving partner has the right to continue…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. In re LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Mares v. MaresMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Silver v. EakinsMontana Supreme Court · 1918
  4. People ex rel. Allen v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Boehme v. FitzgeraldMontana Supreme Court · 1911

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API