United States v. Leviton
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1DissentFrank, Circuit Judge
1. The first ground of my dissent is what I deem a flagrant violation of the so-called “MeNabb rule.” 1 That rule renders a confession inadmissible in a federal trial if obtained in violation of the requirement, now set forth in Criminal Rule 5(a), that “An officer making an arrest * * * *858shall take the arrested person without unnecessary delay before the nearest available commissioner or before any other nearby officer empowered to commit persons charged with offenses against the laws of the United States.” The purpose of the McNabb rule is to procure for an arrested person the following…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Upshaw v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Anderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.