Legal Opinion
Carruba v. Speno
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided May 12, 1967PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEINFELD, Judge.
From a judgment of $22,000.00 in favor of Myrtle Speno, Norman Carruba appeals and from the adjudication that the judgment should be credited by $9,000.00 which was paid in settlement by Veto Speno, through his insurance carrier, Myrtle Speno cross-appeals. The judgment was to compensate for the injuries Mrs. Speno received in an automobile accident.
On the 21st day of January, 1962, Myrtle Speno was a passenger in a Falcon automobile owned and driven by her husband, Veto Speno. They were proceeding eastwardly on U. S. Highway 119 in Bell County at a point between Pineville…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Scott v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Lexington Country Club v. StevensonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
- Reader v. OttisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Christensen Ex Rel. Christensen v. SheldonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
- Adams Construction Company v. BentleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,437 Pamela Morales, Guardian of Gary Thompson v. American Honda Motor Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Constance Snowden v. D. C. Transit System, Inc., and James L. IveyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- District of Columbia v. JacksonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Joe Carruba, Administrator of the Estate of Norman Carruba v. Transit Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
- Goldsen v. SimpsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.