Legal Opinion

United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 19, 1993No. 88 CIV. 4486 (DNE)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

EDELSTEIN, District Judge:

This opinion emanates from the voluntary settlement in the action commenced by the plaintiffs United States of America (the “Government”) against the defendants International Brotherhood of Teamsters (the “IBT”) and the IBT’s General Executive Board (the “GEB”) embodied in the voluntary consent order entered March 14, 1989 (the “Consent Decree”). The remedial provisions in the Consent Decree provided for three Court-appointed officials, the Independent Administrator to oversee the remedial provisions, an Investigations Officer to bring charges…

2Cases cited7 opinions

National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner- Cross v. Bogart Sportswear Mfg. Co., Inc., International Ladies' Garment Workers Union, Intervenor-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
Fun Striders, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
National Labor Relations Board v. Zoe Chemical Co., Inc., and Local 803, Allied Aluminum and Industrial UnionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
The Visador Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995