Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 1993No. 19536PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Chief Judge.

The state appeals from the post-trial order dismissing the criminal charges against Dion Smith for failure to allege facts sufficient to establish subject matter jurisdiction. The state asserts the district court erred by not taking judicial notice that U.S. Highway 95 is maintained by the state — a jurisdictional fact which was not in evidence. For the reasons specified below, we reverse the order of the district court and remand the case for further proceedings.

By an information dated November 5, 1987, the state charged Dion J. Smith with two offenses, leaving the scene…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Farm Bureau Fin. Co., Inc. v. CarneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. MajorIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Matter of HansonIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. MichaelIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Safeco Ins. Co. of America v. YonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Udy v. Custer CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. L.J.M.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  3. State v. AmbroIdaho Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. State v. SmithIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. State v. AmbroIdaho Court of Appeals · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API