Legal Opinion

Board of Commissioners v. Hakim

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 16, 1975No. Appeal, No. 1479 C.D. 1974PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Wilkinson,

This case concerns a planned unit development (P.U.D.) ordinance enacted by O’Hara Township in accordance with Article VII of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, Act of July 31, 1968, P. L. 805, as amended, 53 P.S. §10701 et seq.

Appellee is the owner of a tract of land in O’Hara Township, Allegheny County, upon which he desires to build two ten-story high rise apartment buildings, providing a total of 294 apartments. The tract consists of two parcels of ground: parcel No. 1, being 2.949 acres fronting on the east side of East Oak Hill Road; parcel No. 2,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Garbev Zoning CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Doran Investments v. Muhlenberg Township Board of CommissionersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Pantry Quik, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of City of HazletonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Mentha Corp. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of City of Philadelphia & Captree AssociatesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Consumers Education & Protective Ass'n v. NolanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Route 4 Associates v. Town of Sherburne Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  3. Coder v. Commonwealth, State Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Jeske v. Upper Yoder TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Municipality of Bethel Park AppealCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API