Legal Opinion

Route 4 Associates v. Town of Sherburne Planning Commission

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 15, 1990No. 89-188PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

Petitioner Route 4 Associates appeals from a decision of the superior court denying an application for a planned unit development (PUD) in the Town of Sherburne. We affirm.

Petitioner seeks PUD approval for construction of a 100-unit hotel on property separated by a privately owned strip of land approximately 50 feet in width and 450 feet in length. The separated lots are 3.8 acres and 2.39 acres in size. The Town of Sherburne Planning Commission denied petitioner’s application on the ground that neither parcel met the five-acre minimum-lot-size requirement set forth in the town’s zoning…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Roy F. Stamm Electric Co. v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  2. Bryant v. City of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  3. Lien v. Northwestern Engineering Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Hillman v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Town of Lyons v. City of Lake GenevaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re DuncanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  2. In re Vermont National BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  3. Secretary, Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. Handy Family EnterprisesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  4. In Re Tyler Self-Storage Unit PermitsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  5. Badger v. Town of FerrisburghSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API