Legal Opinion

Mediterranean Shipping v. Ningbo Toptrade

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 5, 2012No. 10-4735-cvUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

10-4735-cv Mediterranean Shipping v. Ningbo Toptrade UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT AMENDED SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY THIS COURT’S FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND LOCAL RULE 32.1.1 . WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sinoying Logistics Pte Ltd. v. Yi Da Xin Trading CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  2. Shipping Corp. of India Ltd. v. Jaldhi Overseas PTE Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  3. Hawknet, Ltd. v. Overseas Shipping AgenciesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  4. Scanscot Shipping Services GMBH v. Metales Tracomex LTDACourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  5. India Steamship Co. v. Kobil Petroleum Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API