Legal Opinion

India Steamship Co. v. Kobil Petroleum Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 16, 2010No. Docket 09-4564-cvPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In anticipation of arbitration, plaintiff India Steamship Company Limited (“ISC”) attached $1,653,168 belonging to defendant Kobil Petroleum Limited (“Kobil”), pursuant to Rule B of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions (“Rule B”), as the funds passed briefly through New York en route from one foreign Kobil account to another. Kobil entered a general appearance, and the attached funds were transferred by consent order to the Southern District Clerk. Following this Court’s decision in Shipping Corp. of India v. Jaldhi Overseas Pte Ltd., 585 F.3d…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. First National City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Shipping Corp. of India Ltd. v. Jaldhi Overseas PTE Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  3. Cricket S. S. Co. v. ParryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
  4. Allied Maritime, Inc. v. DESCATRADE SACourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  5. Scanscot Shipping Services GMBH v. Metales Tracomex LTDACourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Genger v. TR INVESTORS, LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
  2. China National Chartering Corp. v. Pactrans Air & Sea, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  3. India Steamship Co. v. Kobil Petroleum Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  4. India Steamship v. KobilCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  5. Mediterranean Shipping v. Ningbo ToptradeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API