State v. Wade
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Toal, Justice:
The sole issue presented in this appeal is whether an indictment should be quashed as unconstitutionally vague or over-broad if it alleges that a criminal offense occurred at some point within a two year time period. We hold that under the particular circumstances of this case, the trial judge acted properly in refusing to quash the indictment.
FACTS
The Appellant John Wade was tried for the offense of criminal sexual conduct with a minor in the first degree. The body of the charging indictment read as follows:
That John D. Wade, Jr. did in Aiken County at divers times during 1984…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- Covington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
- State v. SwallowSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. MunnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- State v. PierceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- Riggins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
- State v. ReddickCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- State v. BakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.