Legal Opinion
Creamer v. General Teamsters Local Union 326
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 23, 1983No. Civ. A. 81-515PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STAPLETON, District Judge.
This action arises out of the termination of employment of plaintiffs Stephen M. Creamer and Spud M. Burns. Plaintiffs were employed by Universal Coordinators, Inc. (“Universal”), a labor-leasing company, and at the time of termination, their services were being leased to Inland Container Corp. (“Inland”). The General Teamsters Local Union 326 (“Teamsters”) and Universal were parties to a collective bargaining agreement which governed the terms and conditions of employment of the plaintiffs. The case is currently before me on Inland’s motion to dismiss for the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Tobacco & Allied Stocks, Inc. v. Transamerica Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1956
- Tobacco and Allied Stocks, Inc. v. Transamerica Corporation, Howard S. CullmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- Daniel J. Murray, D/B/A Big Sky Toyota v. Toyota Motor Distributors, Inc., and Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., CorporationsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Giordano v. CzerwinskiSupreme Court of Delaware · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mister Donut of America, Inc. v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. LuzanillaArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- United States v. VigoaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1987
- Creamer v. General Teamsters Local Union 326District Court, D. Delaware · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Children's Services Division v. PageCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.