State v. First Resort Properties
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
The only question before us is whether North Carolina had jurisdiction to try this case. Defendant has abandoned its challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. App. R. 28(a). We note that Florida law also makes issuing and delivering worthless checks a crime, under language substantially similar to our worthless checks statute. G.S. 14-107; Fla. Stat. Ann. Section 882.05 (West Supp. 1986). See State v. Bower, 341 So. 2d 216 (Fla. App. 1976) (general discussion of offense). The commission of a crime is therefore established, and the only question we need decide is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. HunterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
- State v. . HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
- Huddleston v. . HardySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Dunlap v. . WillettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. LalindeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- State v. ChristianCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2023