Brewer v. City of Norman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentBerry, Justice
(dissenting) :
I disagree with the majority opinion.
In my view where a city’s street improvements materially impair an abutting owner’s right of access to the street the abutting owner is entitled to compensation.
Art. II § 24, Okla.Const., provides:
“Private property shall not be taken or damaged for public use without just compensation. * * * ”
This section authorizes recovery for damages notwithstanding there is no physical invasion of plaintiff’s property if plaintiff suffers a special injury different in kind, and not in degree, from that suffered by the community in general. Atchison, T. &…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Henthorn v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Terminal Oil Mill Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. BowlesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- City of Tulsa v. HindmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.