Legal Opinion · Dissent

David Rutherford v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 9, 1982No. 838, Docket 81-6248Published

1DissentTimbers, Circuit Judge

I regret that I am unable to concur in Judge Van Graafeiland’s characteristically well written majority opinion. In dealing with one of the most disabling illnesses of our society — chronic alcoholism, I think it is critical that proper legal standards be applied in evaluating the evidence before denying or cutting off Social Security benefits. In my view neither the Secretary nor the ALJ applied proper legal standards here. I therefore respectfully dissent from the majority’s affirmance of the judgment below.

Although the Secretary’s decision ordinarily will be upheld if supported by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Helene Marcus v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  2. Hanna Miles v. Patricia Harris, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  3. Carl G. Underwood, (Social Security Account Number Tqv-Im-Bnsb v. Abraham A. Ribicoff, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
  4. Thomas E. Depaepe, Sr. v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary, Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  5. Geneva Northcutt v. Joseph Califano, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API