(1974)
Wisconsin Attorney General Reports
1Opinion of the Court
PATRICK J. LUCEY, Governor
You request my opinion as to the scope of your duty, if any, to allow members of the public to examine and copy documents in your office of which you have official custody as Governor.
Your inquiry is occasioned in part by a request from a citizen to examine all correspondence addressed to you concerning a bill recently passed by the legislature. However, you are also concerned with any duty you have to permit examination with respect to the following:
"(1) Correspondence
"(a) concerning or explaining legislation or other matters of general concern or official policies…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. V. E. B. Carl Zeiss, JenaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Opinion No. Oag 28-83, (1983), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1983
- Opinion No. Oag 4-78, (1978), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1978
- Opinion No. Oag 5-84, (1984), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1984
- Opinion No. Oag 91-77, (1977), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1977
- Opinion No. Oag 17-79, (1979), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.