Legal Opinion

In re Kesler

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 2018No. DA 17-0666PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice Beth Baker delivered the Opinion of the Court.

***540¶ 1 Wendy Rogers appeals the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and ***541final parenting plan ordered by the Third Judicial District Court, Anaconda-Deer Lodge County. She alleges multiple errors in the District Court's factual findings and in its parenting plan determination. We do not adopt the District Court's findings in full, but upon review of the record conclude that substantial evidence supports its decision and that Wendy has not demonstrated reversible error. We affirm the parenting plan.

PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Amadeo v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. In Re the Marriage of TummarelloMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  4. In Re the Marriage of CrillyMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Lee v. LeeMontana Supreme Court · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re The Marriage of: BoeshansMontana Supreme Court · 2025
  2. In re HerreraMontana Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Marriage of SchmidtMontana Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Marriage of WilliamsMontana Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Parenting of A.F.Montana Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API