Gray v. Larrimore
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of California
Trial of issues by the court This was an action to recover the possession of land in San Francisco, and was brought by Matilda C. Gray and Franklina C. Gray (an Infant suing by next friend) against Richard Larri-more and others. The facts immediately material to the decision are stated in the opinion of the court. See, also, Gray v. Brignardello, 1 Wall. (68 U. S.) 627.
1Opinion of the Court
FIELD, Circuit Justice.
This was an action to recover the possession of certain real property situated within the city of San Francisco, and the rents and profits of the same whilst withheld from the plaintiffs, It was tried by the court without a jury, pursuant to a stipulation of the parties at the June term of 1865.
Both parties claimed title from the same source — from Franklin C. Gray, who died intestate in July, 1S53, possessed of a large property, real and personal. Of the real property, the premises in controversy were a portion. The deceased left surviving him a widow, Matilda C. Gray,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Moss v. ShearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Mills v. MartinNew York Supreme Court · 1821
- Ricketson v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Gray v. Palmer & EatonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Hooper v. Wells, Fargo & Co.California Supreme Court · 1864
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kelley v. KelleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
- Werz v. WerzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1881
- Gibney v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1888
- Williams v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893
- Martin v. BarbourUnited States Circuit Court · 1888
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.