Legal Opinion
Imperial Glass Co. v. Heisey
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 4, 1923No. 3845PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENISON, Circuit Judge.
The District Court made the usual interlocutory decree for injunction and accounting in a suit brought for *268the infringement of design patent, No. 43,852, issued to plaintiff below April 15, 1913, upon an application filed by A. J. Sanford, February 3, 1913. The design is said to be for a nappy, which is defined by the testimony as a round bowl for containing fruit, preserves, sauce, or anything of that sort. It is shown in the following figure:
The ornamentation consists of a series of panels, called flutes, which in. horizontal cross-sections show a concave recess…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smith v. Whitman Saddle Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Steffens v. SteinerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
- Knapp v. Will & Baumer Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Mygatt v. SchafferCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- Charles Boldt Co. v. Nivison-Weiskopf Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Deep Welding, Inc. v. Sciaky Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- In re BayerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
- Popeil Brothers, Inc. v. Schick Electric, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Thabet Manufacturing Company, D.B.A. American Beauty Ventilated Aluminum Awning Company v. Kool Vent Metal Awning Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
- Jockmus v. LevitonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.