Kaluszka v. Town of East Hartford
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
*750 Opinion
2Per curiam
The defendants, the town of East Hartford (town) and its mayor and chief of police,1 appeal from the judgment rendered by the trial court in this declaratory judgment action. On appeal, the defendants claim that the court improperly decided that the legislature has preempted municipalities from regulating hunting within their boundaries and that § 13-33 (b) (5) of the code of ordinances of the town of East Hartford2 conflicts with General Statutes § 26-27c.3 We affirm the *751judgment of the trial court for the reasons set forth in the court’s comprehensive memorandum of decision.
On…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- In re Karrlo K.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- East v. LabbeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- East v. LabbeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Kaluszka v. East HartfordConnecticut Superior Court · 1999
4Cited by4 opinions
- Davis v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Serafin v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Firearm Owners Against Crime v. Lower Merion TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Firearm Owners Against Crime v. Lower Merion TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016