Legal Opinion

Stachnik v. Winkel

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1975No. 55418, (Calendar No. 19)Published

1Opinion of the Court

394 Mich. 375 (1975)

230 N.W.2d 529

STACHNIK

v.

WINKEL

Docket No. 55418, (Calendar No. 19).

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Argued November 8, 1974.

Decided June 24, 1975.

Zerafa, Zerafa & Tremp, P.C., for plaintiffs.

Hubbell, Blakeslee, McCormick & Houlihan, for defendants Beach.

WILLIAMS, J.

Plaintiffs ask this Court to require defendant Mary E. Winkel[1] to convey property. Plaintiffs worked for defendants Beach cutting lumber on property adjacent to defendant Winkel's property, which was the only access to the lumbering operation. Finding plaintiffs Andrew Stachnik and Clayton Stevens misrepresented to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Kropf v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Christine Building Co. v. City of TroyMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Bein v. HeathSupreme Court of the United States · 1848

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API