Legal Opinion

Godfrey v. Apfel

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided October 26, 1999No. 98-4109-SACPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CROW, Senior District Judge.

This is an action to review the final decision of the defendant Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying the claimant Martin W. Godfrey’s applications for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act (“Act”) and for supplemental security income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Act. The case is ripe for decision on the parties’ briefs filed pursuant to D.Kan.Rule 83.7. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The claimant applied for disability benefits under Title II on March 18, 1996, asserting he had been disabled as of July…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Glen W. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  5. Mary Hope CASIAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thompson v. ApfelDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API