Stordahl v. Rush Implement Company
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Doyle
This is an appeal from a judgment given the respondent by the trial court, sitting without a jury, in the Thirteenth Judicial District for the County of Yellowstone.
The original claimant, Stordahl, was employed by the Rush Implement Company, and the employer had elected to come under Plan Two of the Montana Industrial Accident Board. The employee was insured by the Glacier General Assurance Company.
We shall refer to claimant as such, even though he is now deceased as will appear.
Claimant on June 18, 1963, was seated tightening bolts on a grain swather, when someone tripped the hydraulic…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Moffett v. Bozeman Canning Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933
- Industrial Commission v. Corwin HospitalSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
- Morgan v. Butte Central Mining & Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1920
- Winchester Milling Corp. v. SencindiverSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927
- Lupien v. Montana Record Publishing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Azure Ex Rel. Marchington v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 1979
- Erhart v. Great Western Sugar CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1976
- Dallas v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1984
- Jones v. Bair's CafesMontana Supreme Court · 1968
- Hurlbut v. Vollstedt Kerr CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1975
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.