Legal Opinion

Kristiansen v. Aldaoud

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided June 15, 2023No. 2:22-cv-01976Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Kjell Kristiansen, No. CV-22-01976-PHX-DJH 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Feras Aldaoud, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Defendant Feras Aldaoud, MD (“Dr. Aldaoud”) and his spouse, Defendant Chaden 16 Mourani (collectively “Defendants”), have filed a Motion to strike certain allegations made 17 by Plaintiff Kjell Kristiansen (“Plaintiff”) in his First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) 18 (Doc. 14). (Doc. 16) (Defendants’ “Motion to Strike”). Plaintiff filed a Response (Doc. 19 18) and Defendants filed a Reply (Doc. 19).1…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Whittlestone, Inc. v. Handi-Craft Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Fantasy, Inc. v. FogertyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  3. Sidney-Vinstein v. A.H. Robins Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. Christian v. Mattel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Platte Anchor Bolt, Inc. v. IHI, INC.District Court, N.D. California · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API