Legal Opinion
In re the Objection of Markel Insurance Companies
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 3, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
CUFF, J.A.D.
In these appeals, surplus lines insurers challenge the constitutionality of a regulation promulgated in 1996 by the Commissioner of the Department of Banking and Insurance which imposes on these insurers a “special purpose apportionment”2 authorized by N.J.S.A. 17:1C-19 to -32. The common thread of the insurers’ broad based attack on the regulation is that they have insufficient connections with this State to qualify as an insurer “doing business” in New Jersey. The Commissioner rejected the insurers’ challenge to the regulation. We affirm.
I…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Prudential Insurance v. BenjaminSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State Board of Insurance v. Todd Shipyards Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re I/M/O Route 206 New Amwell Rd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- Capital Health System, Inc. v. New JerseyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2016