Legal Opinion

Walker v. Sandwick

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1976No. 14266PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice:

Plaintiff Lowell Walker, an independent insurance agent, sold to the defendants Richard L. Sandwick and Pete R. Falvo, dba Pete and Dick’s Auto Sales, a liability insurance policy issued by Yosemite Insurance Company, and sued for the premiums thereon. The defense asserted was that the plaintiff had not shown that'he had the right to receive the premium. Upon a trial the court found the issue in favor of the plaintiff.

The defendants’ argument is that to entitle the plaintiff to recover the premiums he must show either (1) an assignment of the insurance company’s rights to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. F. M. A. Financial Corp. v. Build, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1965
  2. B & R SUPPLY COMPANY v. BringhurstUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Blake v. BlakeUtah Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Freed Finance Company v. Stoker Motor CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  5. American Aggregate Corp. v. Otto Buehner & Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1974

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stubbs v. HemmertUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Trayner v. CushingUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Espinoza v. Safeco Title Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Collier v. HeinzCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
  5. Nelson v. NewmanUtah Supreme Court · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API