Legal Opinion

City & County of San Francisco v. Staude

California Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1891No. 14056PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Fitzgerald, C.

This action is brought by plaintiff against the defendants as sureties on a forfeited undertaking of bail. The answer contains no denial of any of the material allegations of the complaint, but sets up two so-called separate defenses, which are, in substance, as follows: —

“1. That the woman whose release was procured by the execution of the undertaking herein was, previous thereto, tried by a jury for the crime of grand larceny, and they, having failed to agree upon a verdict, were discharged from the further consideration of the case; that by reason of such disagreement and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Loveland v. GarnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Felch v. BeaudryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Hemme v. HaysCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. St. Mary's Hospital v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Boscus v. BohligCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Benham v. ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. People v. United Bonding InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Montana Mining Co. v. St. Louis Mining & Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API