Benham v. Connor
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of Sán Francisco. John F. Finn, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C.
This action was brought to recover the amount due on three negotiable promissory notes, each of which was separately set out in the complaint, and alleged to have been executed by the defendant, and to have been indorsed by the payee thereof to the plaintiff. The complaint was duly verified. In due time the defendant filed an unverified answer to the complaint, containing a general denial of all its allegations, and setting up as a counterclaim an alleged cause of action against the payee of two of the said notes. Thereafter, the plaintiff served notice on the defendant that on the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Loveland v. GarnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Felch v. BeaudryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Hemme v. HaysCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- City & County of San Francisco v. StaudeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by6 opinions
- McKenney v. EllsworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- St. Mary's Hospital v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Boscus v. BohligCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Kafka v. O'MalleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Evinger v. MoranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.