Legal Opinion

Finn H. Magnus and Elsie A. Magnus v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 7, 1958No. 12470_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KALODNER, Circuit Judge.

Finn H. Magnus (“taxpayer”) 1 and Elsie A. Magnus, husband and wife, residents of New Jersey, instituted this action in the Tax Court for a redetermination of a tax deficiency of $14,387.40 assessed for calendar year 1951. The questions presented concern the nature of payments in the amounts of $18,638.-76 and $11,437.22 received by taxpayer in 1951 from a corporation then controlled by him, Magnus Harmonica Corporation (“Magnus”), known, prior to 1947 as International Plastic Harmonica Corporation (“International”). The Tax Court determined that such payments were…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Myers v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1946
  3. Allen, Collector of Internal Revenue v. WernerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  4. Orla E. Watson and Edith Watson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  5. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Celanese Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bell Intercontinental Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  2. Arthur M. And Ruth F. Young v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  3. First National Trust & Savings Bank of San Diego v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1961
  4. Wernentin v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API