Legal Opinion

State v. Champlain

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided December 5, 2007No. 2006AP2435-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.

¶ 1. A juiy' found Kevin M. Champlain guilty of burglary and obstructing an officer. Champlain appeals from the ensuing judgment of conviction and from an order denying his motion for post-conviction relief. The lead issue stems from the jail administrator's requirement that Champlain wear an armband taser device at the jury trial. Champlain challenges the propriety of its use and, separately, alleges that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to his wearing the device in the presence of the jury.

¶ 2. We agree with Champlain that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. MacHnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. ThielWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. EricksonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. ZieglerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  2. United States v. Jonathon LambCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. Shane SahmCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  4. Winnebago Cnty. v. J.M. (In Re Mental Commitment of J.M.)Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Young v. WelytokCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API