Legal Opinion
In Re Upset Sale Tax Claim Bureau of Luzerne County Pennsylvania Held December 11, 2008
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 2, 2010No. 1373 C.D. 2009PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge SIMPSON.
David Keller (Purchaser), representing himself, seeks review of an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County (trial court) setting aside a tax sale on the basis the Luzerne County Tax Claim Bureau (Bureau) failed to comply with the notice requirements of Sections 601 and 602 of the Real Estate Tax Sale Law (Law). 1 Purchaser contends the trial court erred in not upholding the sale under Section 601(a) of the Law (no additional notice of adjourned or continued tax sale necessary if sale held by the end of the calendar year), where the Bureau complied with…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jones v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- LTM-7 Associates v. Clinton County Tax Claim BureauCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Fernandez v. Tax Claim Bureau of Northampton CountyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- In re Sale of Property of DalessioCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- In re Consolidated Return of the Sale of Properties for Delinquent TaxesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re: Sale of Tax Delinquent Property on October 19, 2020 ~ Appeal of: R. HovanecCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024