Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 9, 1989PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

Jay Tee Smith appeals a decision of the Superior Court denying his motion for a new trial following his conviction on the charges of Robbery First Degree and Conspiracy Second Degree. Among other arguments, Smith maintains that the prosecu tor improperly commented at trial upon the refusal of the appellant’s brother, Robert Smith, an alleged co-conspirator and former co-defendant, to be sworn and testify at the appellant’s trial, and that such commentary constitutes impermissible and prejudicial error under Fletcher v. United States, 332 F.2d 724 (D.C.Cir.1964). However, in our…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Dutton v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  3. DeShields v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
  4. Robert J. Fletcher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  5. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Capano v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  2. Lilly v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  3. Floudiotis v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999
  4. Wilmington Country Club v. CoweeSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  5. Keyser v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API