Legal Opinion
Richter v. Reynolds
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 12, 1893No. 21PublishedCited by 18 opinions
Appeal from the United States Circuit Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. In Equity. Suit by Dr. F. Ad. Richter, doing business as F. Ad. Richter & Co., against W. E. Reynolds and John Sullivan, doing business as the Anchor Remedy Company, for infringement of a trademark. Bill dismissed. 52 Fed. 455. Complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
DALLAS, Circuit Judge.
There are 17 assignments of error in this case. Only 2 of them relate to matters of fact, and by them it is alleged that the circuit court erred—
“In finding that complainant had made no sales in this country of medicinal compounds hearing the trade-mark in issue prior to the date of the opening of his New York branch house; and in finding' that the complainant had not made sales in the United States, nor importations thereto, prior to his registration of 1885.”
What the court said is:
“The proofs show that the plaintiff’s factory is at Rudolstadt, Germany, where his goods…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Kohler Manuf'g Co. v. BeeshoreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1893
3Cited by18 opinions
- Le Blume Import Co. v. CotyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- Stone Creek, Inc. v. Omnia Italian Design, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Hanover Star Milling Co. v. Allen & Wheeler Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1913
- Layton Pure Food Co. v. Church & Dwight Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
- Sartor v. SchadenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.