Legal Opinion

Ungar v. Handelsman

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 7, 1992No. 82, September Term, 1990PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAULIFFE, Judge.

Ruth R. Ungar and her husband, Norbert T. Ungar, lost their medical malpractice claim against Dr. Jacob C. Handelsman when summary judgment was entered against them in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City. They contend that summary judgment should not have been granted, either because the record disclosed contested issues of material facts, or because the trial judge abused his discretion in not continuing the hearing to permit them to obtain counsel and to file any additional documents required to more clearly show the existence of a genuine dispute as to material facts. The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Radman v. HaroldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  3. Driver v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Yale Simons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  5. Wolfinger v. FreyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Okwa v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. Blackwell v. WyethCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  3. Grayson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. Absolon v. DollahiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. Warehime v. DellCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API