Legal Opinion

Lamberson v. Long

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 7, 1896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the ,Louisiana Court of Common Pleas.— ’ Hon. Reuben E. Roy, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRombauee, P. J.

The action is slander. The petition charges that the defendant willfully, wantonly and maliciously, spoke of and concerning the plaintiff certain words, imputing to him the crime of larceny, in the presence and hearing of certain persons named. The answer denies that the defendant willfully, wantonly and maliciously, spoke the words in the presence and hearing, etc. If by this answer it was intended to deny the speaking of the words, the answer is bad, as an answer in that form under well settled rules admits the speaking and denies the malice and other attendant circumstances only. Emory v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Powers v. KueckhoffSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
  2. State v. RossSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  3. Thompson v. LyonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1862
  4. Tomlinson v. LynchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1862
  5. Emory v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Minter v. Bradstreet Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  2. Groes v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1919
  3. Cook v. Globe Printing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API