Legal Opinion

State v. Ross

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 15, 1872PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Ray Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBliss, Judge

The defendant was charged, by information, with disturbing' the peace of the family of the complaining witness, and fined $1. Before the case was tried, the act authorizing informations for misdemeanor was repealed, and defendant claims that the court in consequence ceased to have jurisdiction over him. But the general act concerning “laws,” etc. (Gen. Stat. 1865, ch. 5, § 7; Wagn. Stat. 895), provides that “ no action, plea or prosecution, civil or criminal, pending at the time any statutory provision shall be repealed, shall be affected by such repeal, but the same shall proceed in all…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. McNultyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Minter v. Bradstreet Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  3. Protection Mutual Insurance Co. v. Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Ex Parte WilsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  5. La Porte v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API