Legal Opinion
The Arlington
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 2, 1927No. 265PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
L. HAND, Circuit Judge.
-The barge, Saratoga, was in tow of the tug, Arlington, bound down the Hudson river between Esopus and Poughkeepsie on October 15,1924. The tow was made up of five grain-laden barges, three in the first and two in the second tier, the Saratoga being the port hawser boat. After leaving Esopus Point the weather, which had theretofore been hazy, though proper for navigation,- became thicker, so that the master thought it unsafe to proceed. His reason for this was that at Pough-keepsie he must upon an ebb tide pass between the piers of the railroad bridge which crosses the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- The WyomissingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
- Lehigh Valley Transp. Co. v. Knickerbocker Steam Towage Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- Petrie v. The S. W. MorrisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1893
- The Nathan HaleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1900
- Rose Brick Co. v. The MascotDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1891
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mid-America Transportation Company, Inc. v. National Marine Service, Inc., and M/v National Progress, Her Engines,boilers, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- Chesapeake Bay Bridge & Tunnel District v. LauritzenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
- Brown & Root, Inc. v. American Home Assurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- Chesapeake Bay Bridge And Tunnel District v. J. LauritzenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
- United States v. SorianoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.