Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Schwendiman

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided November 18, 1988No. 880516-CAPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter is before the Court on Appellant’s Motion to Reinstate appeal. We deny the motion.

On January 22, 1988, this Court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was filed prior to entry of an order disposing of a post-judgment motion pursuant to Utah R.Civ. Pro. 59(e) to alter or amend the judgment. Appellant subsequently obtained an order disposing of the post-judgment motion and now argues that R.Utah Ct.App. 4(c) authorizes reinstatement of the appeal because the original notice of appeal was filed after announcement of the decision but before entry…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Sound Lab, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Transamerica Cash Reserve, Inc. v. HafenUtah Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Swenson Associates Architects, P.C. v. State Ex Rel. Division of Facilities ConstructionUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
  3. Kurth v. WiardaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999
  4. Regan v. BlountCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999
  5. Swenson Associates Architects, P.C. v. State Ex Rel. Division of Facilities ConstructionUtah Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API