Legal Opinion

Continental & Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. Corey Bros. Const. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 19, 1913No. 2,264PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the District of Idaho; Frank S. Dietrich, Judge. - Action by the Corey Bros.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the District of Idaho; Frank S. Dietrich, Judge. - Action by the Corey Bros. Construction Company to foreclose a mechanic’s lien on an irrigation system, the property of the defendant Big Dost River Irrigation Company, in which the Union Portland Cement Company intervened to foreclose a lien for material, against the Continental & Commercial Trust & Savings Bank and Frank H. Jones, trustees under a mortgage to secure bonds, and others. From a decree in favor óf complainants, and decreeing that complainants’ liens…

1Per curiam

Corey Bros. Construction Company, a Utah corporation, filed in the court below a bill to foreclose a mechanic’s lien upon an irrigation system, the property of the defendant Big Lost River Irrigation Company, an Idaho corporation. The American Trust & Savings Bank, now the Continental & Commercial Trust & Savings Bank, and Erank H. Jones, both of Illinois, trustees named in a deed of trust relating to bonds issued in connection with such irrigating system, were also made defendants. The Union Portland Cement Company of Utah intervened, and prayed for the foreclosure of a lien for material…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Masterson v. HerndonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Hardee v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Sipperley v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Grand Island & W. C. R. v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  5. Provident Life & Trust Co. of Philadelphia v. Camden & T. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mittry Bros. Const. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  2. Babcock v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  3. Pioneer Canal Co. v. AkinWyoming Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Pflueger v. ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  5. Hudson v. Pacific Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API