Legal Opinion
(PC) Struggs v. Pfeiffer
District Court, E.D. California
Decided November 21, 2019No. 1:18-cv-01336Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CEDRIC LYNN STRUGGS, 1:18-cv-01336-GSA-PC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF 13 vs. RULE 8(a), WITH LEAVE TO AMEND (ECF No. 1.) 14 C. PFEIFFER, et al., THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE TO FILE 15 Defendants. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT NOT EXCEEDING 25 PAGES 16 17 18 19 20 I. BACKGROUND 21 Cedric Lynn Struggs (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil 22 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 27, 2018, Plaintiff filed the Complaint 23 commencing…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Johnson v. DuffyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.