Legal Opinion

State v. Anderson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1971No. 37721Published

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The district court after an evidentiary hearing overruled a motion of defendant for post conviction relief. Defendant appeals. He contends that substitution of counsel appointed to represent him was ineffective.

Defendant and others were tried together in prosecutions for robbery. After a jury verdict of guilty defendant appealed. We affirmed. See State v. Anderson, 184 Neb. 868, 173 N. W. 2d 38 (1969). Defendant had been represented by counsel who had withdrawn the day prior to trial in order to represent another accused. Counsel feared a conflict of interest that was not to develop. Trial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. PutnamNebraska Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State v. MossNebraska Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Eller v. PeytonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1970
  5. State v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API