Whitener v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Phipps, Judge.
Kelley Whitener makes this interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress. For reasons that follow, we affirm.
We must abide by the following three principles when reviewing a trial court’s order concerning a motion to suppress evidence:
First, the judge sits as the trier of facts. The trial judge hears the evidence, and his findings based upon conflicting evidence are analogous to the verdict of a jury and should not be disturbed by a reviewing court if there is any evidence to support it. Second, the trial court’s decision with regard to questions…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. HesterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- In the Interest J. M.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Hopkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Washington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008