Legal Opinion

Brown v. Pollard

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 9, 1893PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Argued at Wytheville. Decided at Richmond. Error to judgment of circuit court of Roanoke county, rendered at its October term, 1891, in an action of detinue wherein Mrs. Massie Sutphin, alias Pollard, was plaintiff, and Garland Brown was defendant. The judgment being against defendant, lié brought the case here on writ of error. Opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtFauntleroy, J.

This action is, in form, detinue to recover from the defendant, Brown, (the plaintiff in error,) the possession of two notes for $500 each, executed by W. Lee Brand to the plaintiff, Sutphin, alias Pollard, which, the declaration alleges, are unlawfully held and detained from the rightful owner, the plaintiff, Sutphin, alias Pollard, by the defendant, the said Brown. The issue was made upon the plea of non detinet, and the jury found “that the defendant unlawfully detained from the plaintiff the two notes, each for the payment of $500, dated 19th of March, 1891, and made by W. Lee Brand, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dunsmore v. LyleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1891

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Palmetto Fire Insurance v. FanslerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
  2. Schechinger v. GaultSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Automotive Material Co. v. American Standard Metal Products Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1924
  4. Cook v. GriffithWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Patton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API