Legal Opinion
Schechinger v. Gault
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 11, 1913No. 1929PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Error from District Court, Canadian County; John J. Carney, Judge. Action by Martin Schechiñger against E. M. Gault and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
Plaintiff in error, as plaintiff, sued the defendants in error, as defendants, in the district court, declaring on a certain contract entered into with J. D. Miller, by F. M. Gault, agent, which is in words and figures as follows:
“Whereas, the party of the first part has sold and agrees to convey to the party of the second part the following real estate, to wit: N. E. J4, se'c. 6, T. 13, R. 10; also the land south of the Rock Island R. R. in the N. W. sec. 5 T. 13, R. 10, for the sum of $13,500 and payable as follows: $1,000 cash in hand to be placed in the First National Bank, of Geary,…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Hepburn and Dundas's Heirs v. Dunlop & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1816
- Easton v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Dresel v. JordanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Halsell v. Renfrow and EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
- Nelson v. Shelby Manufacturing & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Render v. LillardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Reedy v. EbsenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- Weller v. DuskySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Bennett v. GilesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Hyde v. City of AltusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.