Legal Opinion

Skowronek v. United Benefit Life Insurance

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided April 5, 1983No. Civ. 81-10229PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JAMES HARVEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Barbara Skowronek, brought this diversity action as the beneficiary under a contract of insurance issued by the defendant, United Benefit Life Insurance Company, allegedly covering the death of her husband, Raymond Skowronek. Plaintiff is seeking $50,000 in death benefits claimed to be owing under the “Accidental Duty Death Benefits” clause of the contract in question. The defendant has denied coverage, claiming that the circumstances of Raymond Skowronek’s death do not meet the criteria of the accidental death clause.

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Collins v. Nationwide Life Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Merrett v. Preferred Masonic Mutual Accident Ass'n of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. J. A. Riesterer v. Crown Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  5. Minton v. Stuyvesant Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Haley v. American International Life Assurance Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
  2. Nehra v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Erbe v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Rynerson v. National Casualty Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Barbara Skowronek v. United Benefit Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API