Legal Opinion
Update Traffic Systems, Inc. v. Gould
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 20, 1994No. 9:92-cv-02558PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PLATT, Chief Judge.
Defendants move to dismiss plaintiffs Amended Complaint in its entirety under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and for failure to plead fraud with the particularity required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 9(b). For the reasons stated herein, defendants’ motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
The facts as alleged in plaintiffs Amended Complaint indicate that plaintiff, a New Jersey corporation with lawful authority through the Interstate Commerce Commission (hereinafter the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Michael E. Moss v. Morgan Stanley Inc., E. Jacques Courtois, Jr., Adrian Antoniu, and James M. Newman, Morgan Stanley Inc. And James M. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Jeffrey Hecht v. Commerce Clearing House, Inc., William Miller, Louis Ceccoli, and Stanley StephensCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Anthony IndelicatoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re Prudential SEC. Inc. Ltd. Partner. Lit.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Dornberger v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- R.C.M. Executive Gallery Corp. v. Rols Capital Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- BRS Associates, L.P. v. DanskerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Burke v. DowlingDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.