Legal Opinion

In re Javier R.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 21, 2007PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

McGuire, J.

We break no new ground in observing that we have the power to resolve the merits of this appeal only if an actual controversy between the parties exists (Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 713 [1980]). Whether there is a justiciable controversy in this case, however, presents an issue this Court has not *3previously addressed. We conclude that the controversy between the parties that once existed has become moot.

The order appealed from denied the applications pursuant to Family Court Act § 1028 of the appellant, respondent father Robert R., and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hearst Corp. v. ClyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. MATTER OF ANONYMOUS v. New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. In re H. ChildrenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Boggs v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. In re C. ChildrenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Green v. MattinglyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  2. In re Carl J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. Excel Sports Mgt., LLC v. EwaysAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  4. Excel Sports Mgt., LLC v. EwaysAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  5. Matter of Jayding S. (Vanessa S.)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API