Legal Opinion

State v. Ducheneaux

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 2003No. NonePublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SABERS, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Matthew Ducheneaux was charged with possession of marijuana. The magistrate judge ruled that Duche-neaux was entitled to use the affirmative defense of necessity under SDCL 22-5-1. The State appealed the decision to the circuit court. The circuit court reversed and Ducheneaux attempted to appeal to this Court. After this Court dismissed his appeal, Ducheneaux was tried and convicted by a jury in magistrate court. The circuit court denied his appeal and Duche-neaux appeals. We affirm.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] On July 15, 2000, Officer Vinson Weber of the Minnehaha County Police…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. TateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  2. State v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. TalaricoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Christensen v. CarsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. BoettcherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Loesch v. City of HuronSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. SullivanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API